THUNDER BAY—Tensions are mounting as discussions continue over the proposed construction of a deep geological repository (DGR) for nuclear waste in Northwestern Ontario. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) is considering two potential sites: one near Ignace and another near the Municipality of South Bruce.
At the forefront of opposition to the project is Grassy Narrows Chief Rudy Turtle, who voiced his concerns at a recent protest. Chief Turtle expressed disappointment over NWMO’s absence at a scheduled meeting, citing scheduling conflicts. Despite this setback, both parties have expressed willingness to engage in future discussions.
Vince Ponka, regional communications manager with NWMO, clarified that while they were unable to attend the meeting due to prior commitments, they have reached out to schedule future discussions. Mr. Ponka emphasized NWMO’s commitment to transparency and engagement with affected communities.
The proposed repository has sparked fears among residents, particularly in Thunder Bay, where a citizens’ group has launched a postcard campaign warning of potential risks associated with transporting nuclear waste through the city. Environment North, a local advocacy group, has raised concerns about the environmental and safety implications of the project.
NWMO hopes to select a repository location by 2024, but shipping of spent fuel is not expected to commence for at least 20 years. Mr. Ponka reiterated that no transportation route has been finalized, and decisions regarding transportation methods are still under consideration.
Opponents of the project argue for alternative solutions, such as storing nuclear waste near the reactors where it originated. However, NWMO contends that international precedent demonstrates the feasibility and safety of transporting nuclear waste to secure storage facilities.
As discussions continue, both proponents and opponents are calling for thorough consideration of the environmental, safety and community impacts associated with the proposed repository. With regulatory approval processes underway the future of the project remains uncertain amidst ongoing debate and scrutiny.
